August 14, 2026
.png)
A CEO I worked with had been avoiding one conversation with his COO for eleven months. Not because he didn't know what to say. He knew precisely what to say. He had rehearsed it in the car. He had written versions of it in his notes app. He could have delivered it in ninety seconds.
Every time he moved toward scheduling it, one sentence came back: This will break us.
Here is the trap, and it sits underneath almost every stalled conversation I see. We tell ourselves the delay is about content. We need more information. We need the right framing. We need to find the words. So we prepare, and gather, and draft, and the preparation feels like progress.
But the words were never the problem. The room is the problem. What his body was refusing was not a sentence. It was the moment after the sentence. The face changing. The silence. The possibility of tears, or anger, or something ending.
I call this the Emotional Flood. It is one of the Five Risk Categories, the five things a person can be protecting when they avoid a conversation, and it is the one the leadership books skip entirely. Status, belonging, identity, livelihood, those get chapters. The fear of being overwhelmed by feeling, yours or theirs, while trapped in a room with no exit line, barely gets a mention.
Yet in my coaching work it shows up more than any of the others.
You can hear it in how leaders describe the delay. A founder told me she could not ask her intended successor one direct question about his values because she was afraid of the answer. Notice what she was avoiding. Not the question. She had the question memorized. She was avoiding the thirty seconds after it, where the answer might arrive and she would have to feel it with him watching her face.
The flood explains something that otherwise looks like a character flaw. These are decisive people. They negotiate, they fire, they bet the company. Then one conversation with one person turns them into procrastinators, and they conclude something is wrong with their courage. Nothing is wrong with their courage. They have simply predicted an emotional weather event and, quite reasonably, stayed indoors.
The move is small. Name the flood before the meeting, out loud, to yourself or a coach: I am not afraid of this content, I am afraid of what the room will feel like.
That single act of naming moves the fear from the driver's seat to the passenger seat. It doesn't remove it. It demotes it. The CEO did exactly this. The conversation he had rehearsed for eleven months happened six days after we named what he was actually protecting. It was emotional. Nothing broke.
Eleven months of avoidance, and the whole time the conversation was already written.
What conversation have you already written, word for word, that you have not scheduled? And when you picture having it, is it the content you flinch from, or the room?
Watch the video here. And if you want more of these, hit subscribe.
In all that we do, let us seek wisdom, discipline, courage & justice.
Be well,
Keita